What you are about to read is going to
change your world forever, of this I can promise you. I actually apologize that
I have to be the one that brings this unsettling news, but you must know if you
wish to survive for what is coming will either be DRY and heat or ICE and
freezing.
Global warming has been in the news for
over 40 years, and by this time we have become complacent. Our scientists have
come to the agreement that global warming will eventually cause major changes
and problems in the world, but in their way of thinking it will be 50 to 100
years before we will actually have to deal with the effects. The general idea is
that global warming will be slow and the world will find time to discover the
solutions to the problems. New powerful evidence strongly suggests that
this scenario is simply wrong, and we had better prepare for another more abrupt
possibility.
DISCOVERY
MAGAZINE
One of the first hints that something
may be different than what we are being told (especially here in the US) was
published in Discover magazine in September 2002 with the cover announcing
"Global Warming Surprise, A New Ice Age", "Oceanographers have discovered a huge
river of freshwater in the Atlantic formed by melting polar ice. They warn it
could soon bury the Gulf Stream, plunging North American and Europe into frigid
winters."
That was almost two years ago, and no
one listened. Life goes on oblivious to the incredible danger
approaching.
ENGLAND & SIR DAVID
KING
Then in January 2004 enter Sir David
King. Sir King is the Prime Minister of England's chief scientist. Sir King went
to Mr. Blair and told him of the impending worldwide disaster and that they
needed to tell the world of what was about to happen. Tony Blair
told Sir David King to be quiet and not speak. But Sir King felt that this was
simply too important for him to say nothing, so in January of this year he
deliberately went around Mr. Blair and went straight to the American journal
Science where he published his information and concern.
Sir King said in this article, "In
my view, climate change is the most severe problem we are facing today, more
serious even than the threat of terrorism."
England placed a gag order on Sir
David King, and now he is not even allowed to discuss this subject publicly
without threat of detention.
AMERICA & THE
PENTAGON
A month later in February 2004, the
Pentagon became involved, which has stirred the world to action. The Pentagon
has been studying Global Warming for many years because of its possible national
security problems associated with the kind of changes that could present
themselves to the world through Global Warming. A special study was conducted
through one of the Pentagon's departments, the Office of Net Assessment, which
is directed by Andrew W. Marshall, 83, who has the responsibility of identifying
long-term threats to the United States.
Mr. Marshall went to a US based
think-tank called Global Business Network to compile the possibilities of Global
Warming on US national security. A study was completed in October of 2003 and
released to the Pentagon, which was looking at this problem from the point of
view of what is the worst that could happen. It was named "An Abrupt
Climate Change Scenario and Its Implications for United States National
Security." The summary went far beyond what most Pentagon experts
had expected.
Realizing the incredible possibilities
of this study, Mr. Marshall made a decision to publicly report this and other
information to the American people. And probably because of President Bush's
stance on Global Warming, which is beyond negative, he also decided to go around
the president, and he published his information and concern in Fortune magazine
on February 9th 2004. In his article in Fortune, Mr. Marshall explains how
the melting North and South poles and glaciers from around the world are
composed of fresh water and within this fact is the basis of the impending
global weather disaster.
The Gulf Stream or scientifically
referred to as North Atlantic thermohaline conveyor is a stream of warm water
that comes from south of the equator and flows over the surface of the ocean
toward the north where this warm water keeps Northern America and Northern and
Western Europe from freezing. It also holds most of the world's weather patterns
in the way we are used to.
Then as this Gulf Stream cools down, it
drops to the bottom of the ocean and returns as a river in the ocean to the
south where it warms up again and rises to the surface and then returns to the
north one more time in a continuous convection current. It is a huge three
dimensional figure eight. The motor that keep this warm
water flowing is found in the north where the Gulf Stream drops to the bottom of
the ocean. It is the salt density of the ocean that causes this river to drop
and pulls the warm water up from the south.
Now that the poles are melting and
fresh water is flowing into the Atlantic Ocean and the salt density is
decreasing, the Gulf Stream does not drop quiet as far, which results in a
slowing down of this Stream. The Gulf Stream has been dramatically slowing down
now for at least ten years.
As the Gulf Stream slows down, the
warmth is not brought to the North Atlantic region, and the weather patterns
begin to change for they are dependent on this warmth to keep a
balance.
THE MELTING
POLES
The Bush
Administration
During the Bush administration when
discussions have been held on the melting of the North & South Poles, this
government and US corporate entities alike have stated that the world's
scientists are all wrong on their conclusions that say there is great danger,
and have led the American public to believe there is no real problem at
all. However, George W. Bush was the focus of attack by Sir David King
when he wrote his article in Science, for the world's greatest scientific minds,
at least one thousand seven hundred of them with the Union of Concerned
Scientists say that Mr. Bush is ill informed at the least.
Since the US government is 25% of the
CO2 pollution in the world that is creating Global Warming, a discussion of Mr.
Bush's Global Warming policies is paramount. Perhaps one of the best articles
that summaries Mr. Bush's position will be found in the ROLLING STONES magazine
article of May 19, 2004 by Tim Dickinson. What follows in italics is a portion
of this article.
Given the imminent threat
from global warming, even the Bush administration might be expected to launch
a War on Heat. After all, as a candidate in 2000, George W. Bush vowed
to "establish mandatory reduction targets" for carbon-dioxide
emissions, saying he would make the issue a top
priority.
Once Bush became president,
however, reducing carbon emissions was the first promise he broke -- and his
record has been all downhill from there. Only two months after taking office,
the administration withdrew from the Kyoto Protocol, the global treaty that
the United States signed in 1997 to set strict limits on greenhouse emissions.
Instead, Bush instituted a voluntary emissions plan that has been an abject
failure: So far, only fourteen companies have pledged to curb their CO2
output.
The president also folded
the interagency group that monitors climate change into the Commerce
Department -- led by Secretary Don Evans, a former oil and gas executive. And
he called for additional climate research that would delay any meaningful
regulation for at least another decade. "We do not know how much our climate
could or will change in the future," Bush declared in a speech in the Rose
Garden. Such statements spurred an open letter signed by twenty Nobel
laureates, who blasted the administration for having "consistently sought to
undermine" public understanding of man's role in global warming. (Bush's
science adviser refused to be interviewed for this
article.)
Then the censorship began.
In September 2002, the Environmental Protection Agency released an air-quality
report that - for the first time since 1996 - included no mention of global
warming. Seven months later, the White House made wholesale revisions to the
climate-change chapter of the EPA's "Report on the Environment," playing down
human influence, deleting references to the health impacts of global warming
and inserting climate data funded in part by the American Petroleum Institute.
The EPA withdrew the altered chapter, acknowledging in an internal memo that
it "no longer accurately represents scientific consensus on climate
change."
Even some Republicans have
been astounded at Bush's meddling in EPA affairs. "What seems constantly
evident with George W. Bush is that EPA is expected to take its marching
orders from the White House on regulatory matters," says Russell Train, who
headed the agency under Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. "During my time, I
never had that happen. Never." Train, a recipient of a Presidential Medal of
Freedom from the elder Bush, calls the administration's approach to global
warming "totally wrong" and "irresponsible."
Bush can rely on key
Republicans in Congress to block any efforts to curb pollution and stave off
disaster. Sen. James Inhofe, chairman of the Environment and Public Works
Committee, dismisses global warming as a "hoax." In a speech last July, Inhofe
compared the IPCC to the Soviets and extolled the virtues of what he called a
"CO2-enhanced" world. "It is my fervent hope," he concluded, "that Congress
will reject the prophets of doom who peddle propaganda masquerading as science
in the name of saving the planet from catastrophic
disaster."
From another point of view in the same
article we hear: "They (the Bush Administration) do not have a
credible plan, either domestically or internationally, for addressing the
problem (Global Warming), says Michael Oppenheimer, a climatologist at
Princeton University. They (the Bush Administration) argue that they
don't want to address global warming, he says, 'because the science is shaky'.
And that approach is indefensible, because the science isn't
shaky."
The North Pole
Melting
Let's look at the facts. Two
summers ago the North Pole completely melted for the first time in history that
we know of. Both private and military ships floated directly over the actual
North Pole as it was completely water. This area has never been seen to be less
then ten feet of solid ice.
Greenpeace a few years ago announced
that the North Pole's winter to summer snow pack had receded by around three
hundred miles, but no one listened. And today, as I am writing this
article, we are witnessing the Alaska fire that has consumed over one million
acres of forest. This fire is burning in an area that is always wet with rain or
snow until now. And this fire, as you will understand in this article is
directly related to the melting of the poles and the Gulf
Stream.
But finally the Pentagon, thanks to
Andrew Marshall, has told the truth in the Fortune magazine on February 9th. The
Pentagon shows a satellite photo of the North Pole in 1970 and then in 2003,
which reveals that, according to the Pentagon, 40% of the North Pole has melted
in just 33 years. And it is melting faster and faster now. The Pentagon has now
proven that all these government statements that the poles are not melting were
simply a lie. And it is a lie more damaging than anything that Bush's Iraq war
could possibly throw at the United States.
The South Pole Melting
In the South Pole a couple of years ago
Larsen A ledge broke off, which surprised many scientists. At that time we were
told by the scientific personnel that were studying this event that it was no
big deal since this ice ledge had only been connected to the South Pole for
about the last ten thousand years.
And these same scientists also added
that Larsen B ledge that was behind Larsen A ledge would never melt as it has
been there for many ice ages. Yet last year, Larsen's B ledge broke off and went
to sea. These same scientists said that it would take six months to melt because
of its immense size, but again they were wrong. It melted in a mere 35 days, and
more significant, it rose the entire world's oceans by almost an
inch.
Now with Larsen's B ledge gone, an
incredibly enormous ice shelf called Ross's Shelf is exposed and the only thing
holding Ross's Shelf from sliding into the ocean was Larsen's B ledge. According
to my sources, Ross's Shelf is now cracking.
If Ross's Shelf were to slide into the
ocean, it has been estimated that it would raise the entire world's oceans by
sixteen to twenty feet. And that, my friends, would change the world, as almost
every coastal city in the world and many islands along with the country of
Holland would be underwater. Perhaps it will take an event like this to wake up
the world to become serious about Global Warming.
THE ANCIENT
PAST
1300 AD
The Pentagon in their study of what is
now happening in the North Atlantic ocean, has looked into the past to see when
this slowing down or stoppage of the Gulf Stream has happened before and what
actually took place at those time in the world's weather patterns. In
actual fact, this North Atlantic ocean slowing or stoppage has happen hundreds
of times before in the past going back hundred of millions years, but in our
recent past of the last 10,000 years, it has only happened
twice.
The most recent time was in the year
1300 AD, and at that time it simply slowed down. It never actually stopped. And
why it slowed down, scientists are at the moment theorizing. They don't really
know why. It resulted in abrupt global climatic weather changes that never
returned to normal for 550 years. This period of time in our history has been
named the "Little Ice Age" because of the havoc it caused to our weather and the
dramatic cooling that resulted.
What the Pentagon has realized is that
at that time of the "Little Ice Age", the East Coast of America became extremely
cold, while the middle and Western areas of the United States became so dry that
the Midwest became a dust bowl and the mountain forests burned to the ground,
just as they are doing right now today, for you see, this slowing down of the
Gulf Stream has been going on today for about ten years. It also affected Europe
dramatically as their weather changed completely during the "Little Ice
Age".
A study of the Anasazi Indians of the
14th century is enlightening. In Chaco Canyon in New Mexico the Anasazi
completely disappeared, and where they went no one is sure. But one of the
reasons that has emerged from the study of the New Mexico environment for their
leaving the area is that soon after the turn of the 14th century, Chaco Canyon
went into a drought where they didn't receive a drop of rain for 47 years! 47
years of drought will definitely cause anyone to move. No water, no
life.
The archeologists who presented this
study didn't know why the drought happened, but it is clear why it happened with
the information of the Gulf Stream slowing down just before this period. And
this is exactly what the Pentagon believes is about to happen here in America,
Canada and Europe as we speak. We may think that this current
drought in the US West is going to stop soon, but the earth's history with the
Gulf Stream suggests strongly that it will continue for about another 40 years
before it begin to regain balance.
8200 Years Ago
However, the Pentagon report believes
that the Gulf Stream, from everything they know, is not just going to slow down,
but rather it is going to stop. And the last time this happened was 8200 years
ago. And according to the Pentagon, from their research, this is a much more
dramatic scenario. When the Gulf Stream stopped 8200 years ago, it soon left
Northern Europe under a half mile of ice, and New York and England quickly
endured weather similar to Siberia.
Further it resulted in a true "Ice Age"
that lasted about 100 years, and so you can see why the Pentagon is so worried.
According to Andrew Marshall, like Sir David King, he says that this Gulf Stream
problem is a greater threat to US national security (and other countries') than
all of the world's combined terrorism. Really, when you think about it,
terrorism is nothing compared to the stopping of the Gulf Stream. It's not even
close.
Realize that without stable weather
conditions, the growing of food becomes almost impossible, and according to the
Pentagon, this could become such a huge problem for the world in the near
future, that wars will begin to form all over the world, not for oil or energy,
but for food and water. And with whole countries having to evacuate, if
this were to happen, such as Finland, Sweden and Denmark, which will be under
ice, and many other countries for other reasons, this enormous immigration is
what will cause the most threat to national security, again according to the
Pentagon report.
This is why Andrew Marshall and Sir
David King wanted the world to know about what was coming so that the world
could begin to prepare for the inevitable.
THE US
SENATE
Then in March 2004 the US Senate became
aware of what the Pentagon was saying and they appropriated 60 million dollars
to the study of ABRUPT GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGES. This offers hope that soon the US
Senate will begin to tell the world of these coming climate
changes.
THE UNITED
NATIONS
In June 2004, ending on June 29th, a
meeting was held at the United Nations to consider what to do about Global
Warming and the Gulf Stream. 154 countries participated with the result that the
only thing they could figure out what to do was to eliminate the use of
oil and gasoline as soon as possible.
There are those who believe that if we
continue to lower the CO2 levels, that possibly we can slow down the problems,
and, of course, we must do everything we can. This is important for there are
ocean currents other that the North Atlantic that are in every ocean, and if
they all were to stop or slow down, Earth would all most certainly enter a true
ice age. And history has shown that if that were to happen, our civilization
would not return to a warm period again for 90,000 years.
But really, to change or increase the
current of the entire Atlantic ocean to bring it back to "normal" is beyond the
possibilities of the human race and all of it's technologies. It is too late, by
the estimate of most of the world's scientists, to alter the course of what is
about to happen. All we can do now is prepare for the shock. And preparation is
essential, which is the main message of both Sir David King and Andrew
Marshall.
NASA PREPARES
On July 13th, 2004, NASA launched a
satellite, the first of three, that's whole purpose is to study Global Warming.
Besides the study of the ozone, another huge problem associated with Global
Warming, these satellites will monitor the temperature and salt density of the
oceans. Perhaps we will at least be able to monitor the rapid changes and
predict what will happen next.
SOME UNUSUAL WEATHER
CHANGES THAT HAVE HAPPENED
SINCE THE GULF STREAM
SLOWED DOWN
In March 2004 the world saw a major
hurricane hit the coast of Brazil. This is the first time in all recorded
history that a hurricane has struck land in South America.
In May 2004, the United States
witnessed 562 tornadoes in a single month, breaking all records. A few
of these tornadoes were recorded in Seattle, Washington. Never has a tornado
been seen in Seattle. Eastern Canada in the winter of 2003/2004 just had one of
the coldest winters on record.
For several years forest fires have been
burning around the world. The list would be extensive. The north part of
Australia is on fire. Alaska, as we have already mentioned, is burning.
Unprecedented. The entire Western United States is under fire, jumping
from region to region, with the US government announcing that this is the worse
drought in 500 years. Really, the fires are worldwide.
France and Europe had a heat wave in
2003 that caused 15,000 people to die in France and 30,000 through-out Europe
simply from the intense heat caused by Global Warming and the Gulf Stream.
Argentina this month July 2004, had the greatest storm they have ever seen in
their history. Mexico's weather is so strange and wet in some
regions that mold/fungus is forming on their crops. (And in other regions they
are having a drought) As weather patterns begin to change more and more
radically, food growth will become one of our biggest problems.
The coral reefs of the world are dying
because of Global Warming, and this is threatening most of the islands in the
oceans, including those in the Pacific. Anyone living on most islands will
probably have to leave sooner or later because of their fresh water being
corrupted with salt ocean water. Definitely they will have to leave if the
oceans rise much higher.
Further, it was reported on NPR this
morning, July 16, 2004, that fifty percent of the CO2 that has been released in
the atmosphere from our technological society has ended up in our oceans and
this in turn is dropping the PH to the acidic. This in turn is actually
dissolving the coral reefs and killing them along with vast numbers of other
life forms in the oceans.
These are problems simply off the top of
my head. If one were to get serious and really research all the strange weather
problems of the last ten years (the years the Gulf Stream slowed down) one would
begin to be truly aware of the coming abrupt global climate weather changes that
we must all adapt to if humanity is to continue on Earth.
THE 40-FOOT
WALL
In the Pentagon report it suggests that
the United States build a 40-foot wall around the entire country to keep out
people who are immigrating and trying to escape world weather problems. The
Pentagon believes that food and water will be the biggest problem, and since the
US has the money to buy food, they believe we will be best able to resist this
particular problem longer than most countries. People will want to come here
just to get food.
This sounds like something out of
a weird movie, but in fact the US government has already begun the construction
of this wall between the US and Mexico.
SIDE NOTE: Speaking of movies,
The Day After Tomorrow, which was recently released is based on this information
of the Gulf Stream stopping. However, Hollywood exaggerated the results of the
storms so much that most people simply thought it was fantasy. It is not
fantasy, it is really happening, but will it happen as this movie predicts? And
in this movie you saw massive amount of Americans fleeing to Mexico to escape
the extreme cold weather.
I just spoke with a US military person
about two weeks ago who is involved in the construction of this 40-foot wall. In
the discussion, with him about the Gulf Stream, which he was unaware of, he
said, "Oh, now I understand. You see, the wall is straight up and down on the
Mexican side, but it has steps and ladders on the US side to get over the wall
and into Mexico. I never could understand why the government was doing
this."
THE CHANGING OF THE SHAPE
OF THE GULF STREAM
In the Pentagon report they said that
they believed that the stoppage of the Gulf Stream would probably happen in
three to five years from October 2003. This was their best guess, and admittedly
it was only a guess and a theory.
But what they didn't know, because it
was beginning at the actual time of their release of their report, was that the
Gulf Stream was beginning to change shape. The change of shape of the Gulf
Stream is the beginning of the breakdown and stoppage of this warm water current
and the end of our civilization as we know it.
I have this information from two
sources, both of which do not wish to be named right now, but both of them are
world famous scientists. If this is true, then all the effects and timing
of the Pentagon report have to be shifted closer to the present by three to five
years. I don't know if this is true, but in the vein of holding
nothing back, this info is placed in this article. The actual proof will follow
if it will be given to me.
FROM MY HEART TO
YOURS
As I became aware of this information, I
didn't know what to do or if I should write this article. But because I believe
in and love humanity, I finally realized, like Sir David King and Andrew
Marshall, that I must speak out, for knowledge is power.
And when the time comes for us all to
make life decisions, my prayer is that we all go inside where God resides and
listen to our inner Heart. If we trust in ourselves and the presence of Divine
Guidance, we will all know exactly what to do and where to be.
Removal: send
an email tooff@stardoves.com and put in subject line:
remove
Have a friend
sign-up by sending an email toon@stardoves.comand put in subject link ADD
You have
received this email broadcast because you previously agreed to receive
Aquarian related consumer direct marketing somewhere during the use of your
computer when signing up for a service, or at a trade show or one of our allied
marketing partners. We also have 7 web sites that are now affiliated with us
collecting emails and transferring them into one large Aquarian Age opt-in email
list. Should you wish to unsubscribe from our broadcasts, you may do so by
writing us below and sending us the email address you wish removed, or you can
follow the easy on/off procedure above. We lovingly invite you to subscribe your
friends, please place names of only those you feel will benefit from our
e-broadcasts. We feature only Earth Friendly Light-Natured Broadcasts of Vital
Concern and Blessing for Mother Gaia during these crucial
times.