ALE Summer 2002 No. 307

Government Watch

After consultation, the Government seems to be putting the controversial licensing and "full" pint measures on the back-burner.

The licensing plan was to transfer responsibility for pub drink licensing from hearings in open court before magistrates for low fees to (potentially) expensive bureaucratic procedures within local councils before politicians.

The "full" pints plan was to make 95% of a pint legal, making beer unique in the weights & measures sphere. Would you accept 95% of a litre of petrol when paying for a litre?

New Year

After the success of the English national blanket hours extension till 1am on Tuesday 4 June, it seems likely that the New Years Eve extension (covering 36 hours) will become permanent.

Beer Orders

The Government also seems to be having a rethink over the Beer Orders revocation. The main part of the 1989 Orders is now redundant: there are no large brewers with large pub estates any more, though Wolverhampton & Dudley and Greene King are close to the 2,000 pub limit. The lesser aspects of the Orders do have some use still. For instance they contain some protection against closure of community pubs and against brewers selling pubs with covenants preventing their further use as pubs.

Sense of Duty

As predicted in the printed edition of ALE 305, the Chancellor introduced a new progressive system of beer tax in his Budget this year, which means that smaller brewers will pay less tax than larger brewers. However, those who might have been expecting the price of beer to drop by 14p a pint 'in time for the World Cup', as mischievously implied by Mr Brown, will have been disappointed: instead, that '14p a pint' is money that the smaller brewers can use to improve their business, whether it be investing in plant or estate, or marketing, or being able to compete on price with the bigger brewers who can offer bulk discounts to the pubcos.


ALE Summer 2002 No. 307 : Next section
Cambridge & District CAMRA